Get analysis, insight & opinions from the world's top marketers.
Sign up to our newsletter.
Over recent WFA member meetings, marketing leaders from some of the world's biggest brand owners sat down to compare notes on a question every organisation is wrestling with right now: what does effective change actually look like, and how do you tell it apart from 'transformation theatre'? A few clear lessons emerged. Rob Dreblow, WFA's Global Head of Marketing Services, outlines six of them.
The clearest signal that transformation is real isn't a dashboard, it's people. Colleagues reaching out unprompted to learn more. Advocates who start teaching other colleagues. A new vocabulary that shows up spontaneously in leadership conversations, not because it was mandated but because it's genuinely useful. It's what happens outside the spotlight.
For every genuine signal of effective change, there's a louder decoy. Training completion rates. Townhalls that showcase the one shiny pilot project while quietly excluding it from daily work. Tools filled in for compliance rather than actually used. Employee engagement scores. They're not wrong to track, but none of them tells you whether anything has actually changed. The discipline lies in refusing to let reported activity substitute for observed behaviour.
Not everything needs reinventing. The groups were clear on what to hold onto: a genuinely curious, open mindset. Targeted partnerships that bring in specialist capability rather than trying to build everything in-house. Clarity and simple frameworks built on principles rather than process, held to over a longer roadmap rather than reset every quarter. And genuine two-way communication, with regular check-ins that give people a voice.
Ask any marketing leader what's slowing things down, and the answer is rarely “the technology.″ It's existing habits and mindsets resisting change. It's opinion trumping a genuine intent to learn and self-experiment. It's a desire to hold onto control that actually slows things down. And, most uncomfortably, it's a quiet acceptance of mediocrity that undercuts the real potential of growth driven through creative excellence.
There's also a warning about over-reliance on technology: what AI quietly takes away when it absorbs too much of the daily work is the tasks, and the mistakes, that used to teach people how to think. This risk lands hardest on newer colleagues, who lose the chance to build judgment the way earlier generations did, by doing the work themselves rather than just reviewing its output.
Finally, where organisations are seeing traction, they're investing in a few specific areas: recognising and celebrating the people driving change, using partnerships to bring in external inspiration and accelerate their own plans, and shifting toward outcomes-based models. As identified in our recent work with Ogilvy Consulting (available at www.globalbrandtransformation.org), the best marketing leaders transform less and achieve more. The most successful transformations aren't short-term, high-profile blips or ‘theatre’, but a permanent state of purposeful evolution.
These are observations, not recommendations. They come from peer-to-peer sharing among colleagues who are all in the midst of change themselves. Many of these themes will be unpacked at WFA's upcoming CMO Forums in London (17 September) and New York (29 September), both focused on marketing effectiveness. If you're interested in any of these areas, contact r.dreblow@wfanet.org or register at wfanet.org/events.
For more information or questions, please contact Robert Dreblow at r.dreblow@wfanet.org